John Wood explains why a passive approach to kicking during the swim leg of a triathlon might not be best for triathletes, and provides practical solutions to enhance swimming performance MORE
Cross training events such as triathlon offer a number of physiological advantages. First of all, being able to alternate your training modes creates a more balanced loading on the muscular system, which is less likely to lead to muscle strength imbalances and (as a consequence) injury. Secondly, varying your training allows you to work your cardiovascular system more extensively with less chance of localised muscle overload. Then of course, there’s the very important issue of boredom; varying your training mode is more mentally stimulating and less likely to lead to boredom and staleness.
There is however a major drawback, which is the issue of ‘specialisation’ – or rather the lack of it. As a rule of thumb, the specificity law of training favours single-sport athletes – eg if your only activity is cycling, you’ll have the advantage of spending far more time developing the necessary motor skills/patterns and biochemical adaptations in the muscles used on the bike than say a triathlete, who has to divide their time across three disciplines of which two will be non-specific to cycling.
Another confounding factor is one of ‘interference’ between the disciplines of cycling and running, where there’s a considerable overlap between the patterns of muscle recruitment. Both disciplines rely mainly on the calves of the lower leg, the quadriceps and hamstrings of the front and rear thigh respectively and of course the buttock muscles. Also, the ranges of muscle movement in both disciplines are not too dissimilar. Add these facts together and it’s easy to see how the effort invested in the cycling leg of a race can significantly affect your subsequent running performance. An obvious question for triathletes seeking to maximise their overall performance therefore is how best to train and pace the cycling leg to minimise the impact on running performance without losing too much time on the bike?
Research shows that the cycling leg of a triathlon is very critical to subsequent running performance and that central nervous system fatigue and motor control as a result of a prior bout of cycling play a significant role in subsequent running performance in triathletes. Indeed, one study found that a 45-minute high-intensity bike session altered the patterns of muscle recruitment and movement during a subsequent run, particularly at the knee and ankle joints(1). One of the consequences of this altered muscle recruitment was a reduction in ‘running economy’ in the run that followed – ie compared to no prior cycling, the triathletes needed to consume more oxygen to maintain a given running pace (a bad thing!). Unlimited training is no solution either as research shows that during periods of combined high-volume bike and run training, triathletes are by no means immune from injury and may even suffer from cumulative stress precisely because of the cross training nature of their sport(2).
Given these findings, what is the best advice for triathletes seeking to maximise performance when running after a prior bike ride? Here are some starter recommendations based on the current evidence:
Of course, structuring your triathlon training to accommodate the three disciplines is not just about the overlap between biking and running; there’s also the conundrum of pacing your swim to maximise your bike performance. With that in mind, we strongly suggest you read the articles below, which address both of the issues, providing in-depth, cutting-edge practical advice about how to maximise your triathlon performance across the disciplines. It might sound like we’re interfering, but this is most definitely the kind interference that you’ll welcome in your triathlon training!
The latest triathlon research and best practice findings, covering improving technique, strength and conditioning, and endurance nutrition