In recent years, a growing body of evidence has accumulated showing that performing regular bouts of high-intensity interval training is an extremely effective training tool for endurance athletes seeking to maximise performance. Put simply, short sessions of high-intensity intervals are a great way of producing gains in aerobic power, which then enables you to sustain a faster pace for longer.
What’s less clear however is the precise recipe of any high-intensity interval programme for maximising gains. Determining exactly what the optimum interval length and intensity is, the number of intervals needed, and the number of sessions per week is tricky. That’s because so many different studies have been conducted on different athletes of varying fitness levels using a wide array of interval protocols (different interval lengths, numbers of intervals, rest lengths, number of session per week etc). But research by Norwegian sports scientists suggests that the way you implement high-intensity interval training might be rather less important than actually making sure you do it [Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2165-2174]!
In the study, researchers set out to compare the effects of three different high intensity training (HIT) protocols, which were balanced for total load but differed in training plan progression and implementation. Sixty-three well-trained cyclists were allocated to three training groups and instructed to follow a 12-week training program consisting of 24 interval sessions, a high volume of low intensity training (LIT), and laboratory testing. These groups were as follows:
In terms of interval intensity, all the sessions were prescribed as ‘maximal-effort’ sessions. This meant that the cyclists averaged 4.7, 9.2 and 12.7mmol/L of blood lactate in the 16, 8 and 4-minute sessions respectively. Before and after the 12-week intervention, all the cyclists were tested for average sustained power during a 40-minute all-out ride, their peak power output during incremental testing to exhaustion, and also how much oxygen they were able to use while riding with a blood lactate concentration of 4mmol/L (often referred to as lactate or anaerobic threshold).
The key finding was that regardless of the way they implemented the high-intensity programmes, all three groups improved equally across the board. The gains in average sustained power during the 40-minute ride, their peak power output during incremental testing, and also how much oxygen use at 4mmol/L lactate were between 5 and 10% in all the groups, with no differences between the groups.
The key finding in this study is that the way you execute a high-intensity interval training programme in terms of training progression and interval lengths might be less important that previously assumed. This of course comes with one caveat – that the total training load in any interval programme is constant. In other words, two differently structured interval programmes where the total load (over a period of several weeks) is the same are likely to produce similar gains; two programmes where the total loads are different probably won’t – a the higher volume programme might produce better results but only it it doesn’t result in the athlete become over-fatigued and/or overtrained.
in Base endurance training, High intensity training
Andrew Hamilton looks at some research suggesting that adding some mountain biking into a training schedule could reap dividends for your road cycling and triathlon performance MORE
in Endurance training, Training structure and planning
In the first part of this article, we looked at the evidence for and against including different types of stretching in a pre-exercise warm up. In this, we look the science of assembling the most important component of a warm up - the actual warm up! MORE
in Endurance training, Strength, conditioning and flexibility, Training structure and planning
What’s the very best way to warm up for maximum endurance performance? In this 2-part article, Andrew Hamilton looks at what the scientific research says MORE
in Base endurance training, Endurance health and lifestyle, Endurance training, Training structure and planning
According to the conventional thinking late afternoon/early evening - the peak of the daily circadian rhythm - is the best time of day for intense training. But as Andrew Hamilton explains, some recent research suggests that this isn't always the case... MORE
in High intensity training, Other, Strength, conditioning and flexibility, Techniques
Arthur Jones' high-intensity training philosophy has been validated by science. What is it and how can it help endurance athletes looking for strength gains? MORE
in Endurance training, Recovery strategies, Training structure and planning
Andrew Hamilton looks at the science of pre-race tapering. How long do you need to taper for and are there any benefits of a pre-tapering training surge? MORE
The latest triathlon research and best practice findings, covering improving technique, strength and conditioning, and endurance nutrition
The latest findings from running science with practical advice showing you how you can run further and faster whilst staying in peak health
